Former Permanent Secretary in the Ministry of Planning and Devolution, Peter Mangiti, and Director-General of the NYS, Nelson Githinji, have faced a setback in their attempt to restart the NYS scandal case, which involves the embezzlement of public funds.

Attempt to Restart the Case

Mangiti and Githinji sought to have the case start afresh, expressing their desire to recall a witness who had already testified. However, the lawyers representing the accused individuals in the scandal opposed this move, opting to proceed with the case as it stood.

Ruling by Milimani Chief Magistrate

Milimani Chief Magistrate Francis Andayi, in his ruling, deemed the recall of the first witness unnecessary, emphasizing the potential delay it would cause in resolving the matter. As a result, he directed that the case proceed without recalling the witness.

Prosecution’s Intentions

Peter Mangiti and Nelson Githinji

Senior Assistant Deputy in the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions, Alloys Kemo, informed the court of the prosecution’s intention to call 40 witnesses to testify in the case, highlighting the extensive nature of the legal proceedings.

Background of the NYS Scandal

The NYS scandal rocked Kenya, with allegations of widespread corruption and embezzlement of public funds. The case attracted significant attention and scrutiny, underscoring the need for accountability and transparency in government operations.

Charges Against Peter Mangiti and Nelson Githinji

Mangiti and Githinji were among 26 other suspects charged in connection with the loss of Sh791 million from the NYS. They faced accusations of embezzlement and attempts to obstruct justice in the investigation into the scandal.

The ruling against Mangiti and Githinji’s bid to restart the NYS scandal case signifies a step forward in the pursuit of justice. It underscores the importance of upholding the rule of law and ensuring that those implicated in corruption face the consequences of their actions